The year was 1858 and the Union was in a deep political crisis. The center of that crisis was the topic of slavery in the Union, and whether newly admitted states would be free or slave states. In Illinois there was an intense debate between two candidates that set the stage for the future of our country. The debates that I am talking about are the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858.
Stephen Douglas was the incumbent Democratic senator of Illinois and Abraham Lincoln was his Republican challenger. (Faragher, 2006, 422) Lincoln held an antislavery stance and felt that slavery was a moral wrong. (Faragher, 2006, 423) Douglas did not appear to take a definitive stance on slavery. He thought that he was solving the slavery problem by proposing that the status of slavery in the new territories be decided by popular sovereignty. (Faragher, 2006, 434)
In all there were seven debates held throughout Illinois, and the turnouts emphasized the enormity of the political crisis. At every debate there were between 10,000 and 15,000 attendees. The second debate was held in Freeport on, which is along the northern border of Illinois, and Douglas’s stance helped him win re-election but it also alienated him from the Southern Democrats.
Below is the link to an article written on August 27th, 1858 by John T. Morton of the Quincy Dailey Whig and Republican.
http://lincoln.lib.niu.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.2255:1.lincoln
I found this article, that has been digitized, on the Northern Illinois University’s library website. What I found interesting was how precise Lincoln was with his answers while Douglas used vague language for the most part. Senator Douglas seems as though he did not want to take a wholehearted stance on the issue of slavery in the new territories. Is it possible that Douglas was not being clear as a way to appeal to all voters? If that was the case then it helped him win re-election, but it also helped Abraham Lincoln gain popularity and shortly become President when the South succeeded from the Union.
Below is the results from the 1858 campaign for U.S. Senator of Illinois in which Stephen Douglas won.
Image Source: Abraham Lincoln Historical Digitization Project
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This was an interesting summary of the Lincoln-Douglass debates, which did not result in victory for Lincoln but in turn gave him an unmitigated advantage in the North during the subsequent presidential election.
I thought it was quite resourceful to locate an article written about Lincoln and Douglas regarding their political stances and their responses to questions during the debates. It certainly was valuable in portraying Douglass as a true politician by the examples of his ambiguous answers to issues regarding slavery. Also, the diagrams that display the election results of the Illinois campaign for the U.S. Senate were very effective in revealing how close the election actually was. Interestingly, the population in the northern half of state voted for Lincoln, most likely due to the Northerner’s stance against the moral wrongs of slavery.
The visual components of this post were significant in providing support to the main idea. The article written by Morton was effectively referenced and integrated into the composition. Perhaps you might denote the diagram of election results within the composition by expanding the last paragraph regarding Lincoln’s gain in popularity as a result of the debates.
Carolyn Jordan
Post a Comment